Agencies & studios
You're about to hand this to a client. Their reputation problem becomes your reputation problem. An independent pass before delivery is cheaper than the conversation afterwards.
Independent testing · Break Test
Give us the app. We'll find what your team is too close to see. Independent testing before you hand it to a client, open the doors, or point paid traffic at it.
Fixed price $997 for qualifying applications · complex builds quoted separately
Why an outside tester
Not because they're careless — because they know too much. A developer tests the path they wrote. They enter data in the format they expect. They never use the product like someone who's confused, in a hurry, on a bad connection, or actively poking at it.
That's fine until the app leaves the building. Then it meets people who click things in the wrong order, abandon checkout halfway, sign up twice, or wonder what happens if they change the number in the URL.
The failures that hurt most are the ones nobody thought to look for. A payment that succeeds but doesn't register. A permission check that guards the page but not the data. A discount rule that quietly applies to the wrong thing. Those aren't caught by the team that built the feature — they're caught by someone whose only job is to find them.
Built for
You're about to hand this to a client. Their reputation problem becomes your reputation problem. An independent pass before delivery is cheaper than the conversation afterwards.
You ship faster than you can test. Use us as an external layer for releases that matter, without hiring a permanent tester.
No QA colleague to hand it to. Get a second set of eyes that isn't yours before the client finds it.
Paid acquisition multiplies whatever your funnel already does — including losing people at a broken step. Find that before you spend.
Not just for AI-built software. AI tools are where we see this problem most, but any team without independent testing has the same gap. Hand-written code fails the same way.
What we go after
What can someone reach without logging in? What happens when they change an ID in a URL to somebody else's?
Expired sessions, two tabs, stale caches, back button mid-flow, role switching, logged-in users hitting logged-out pages.
Totals, tips, discounts, refunds, currency, tax, payment states that succeed on one side and fail on the other.
Can a completed thing be cancelled? Can a cancelled thing be paid? Do the numbers still agree afterwards?
Can one customer see another's data? Can a staff account act on a record that isn't theirs?
Dead ends, silent failures, confusing errors, mobile/desktop mismatches — the things that lose customers quietly.
Track record
Real findings from applications we tested — client details removed, specifics changed:
A public endpoint returned any customer's name, phone number, booking history, price paid and payment method — with no authentication at all. The identifier was sequential, so the whole customer base could be walked one request at a time. Documented with request, response and impact.
The interface enforced one-time-code verification on signup. The underlying API did not — records could be created directly, skipping verification entirely. The gate existed in the UI only.
A complimentary reward configured for one specific service applied to a different, more expensive one — making it free. Nothing errored. Nothing logged. It simply leaked margin on every redemption.
A completed appointment could still be cancelled by the customer afterwards, leaving revenue, staff and loyalty records disagreeing across five different parts of the product.
Break Test
$997fixed price
What the fixed price covers: one application, up to three user roles, the integrations a normal product has (payments, email, auth), and one round of retesting after you fix things. Subscriptions are fine. Several user roles are fine.
It becomes a custom engagement from $2,500 when the work is genuinely bigger — health or financial data, or a stack of complexity at once (many roles and APIs and webhooks we'd need to test directly). The form below tells you which one you're in before you pay.
Seven questions. If it fits the fixed price, you go straight to checkout. If it's bigger, we'll route you to a quote instead of selling you the wrong thing.
Questions
Testing and remediation are deliberately separate. Findings are only worth something if the person producing them doesn't profit from the repair — so we never inflate a report to sell fixes. If you want help fixing what we find, ask after you've read it and we'll quote that separately.
We confirm your test window by email before work begins, so you'll have a real date up front. We don't advertise a blanket turnaround because it depends on the application — and an invented number helps nobody.
Yes — that's the most common way agencies and product teams use us, as an external testing layer without a permanent hire. Do one Break Test first, see whether the findings are worth it, then we'll set up something recurring.
A working URL and normal test accounts for each user type — created by you, exactly like a real user's. Never send production admin credentials. If parts of the app must not be touched, you tell us up front and we exclude them in writing.
No, and we won't call it one. We test the application the way an adversarial user would, which surfaces real exposure and authorisation problems — you can see the class of finding above. It is not a formal penetration test and it isn't a security certification. If you need a certified pen test, you need a licensed provider.
The form tells you. If your answers show multiple roles, heavy integrations, subscriptions or regulated data, it routes you to a quote rather than taking your money for the wrong scope.